Skip to content
MosdentISTANBUL 1992
// Mosdent Journal

Understanding Amalgam Fillings: Composition, Benefits, and Considerations

The safety question has been tested directly: measures of memory, attention, visuomotor function and nerve conduction velocity showed no significant differences at any time point (P values 0.29 to 0.91), even though urinary mercury rose. Separately, composite showed lower longevity and more secondary caries than amalgam.

Dr Hakan KavalWritten by
Published
4 minread
Dr Ferit Kaval, PhDmedical review
Dentist examining a reclining patients back teeth with a mouth mirror and probe
Mosdent Journal·4 min
// Quick answer

Dental amalgam is a direct filling material made by mixing roughly 50% elemental mercury with a powdered alloy of silver, tin and copper, which sets into a hard, wear-resistant restoration used mainly in back teeth. Its safety has been tested directly rather than argued: a randomised clinical trial of 507 children in Lisbon, 253 assigned to amalgam and 254 to composite, found no significant differences in memory, attention, visuomotor function or nerve conduction across 7 years of annual follow-up (PubMed 16622140). From year five the composite group needed about 50% more further restorative treatment.

// Key takeaways
  • 01Amalgam is an alloy, not silver: about 50% elemental mercury bound with silver, tin, copper and sometimes zinc.
  • 02The largest randomised safety trial assigned 507 children aged 8 to 10 to amalgam or composite and found no neurobehavioural differences over 7 years, with P values from 0.29 to 0.91 (PubMed 16622140).
  • 03Urinary mercury was measurably higher in the amalgam group, by 1.0 to 1.5 micrograms per gram creatinine, with no matching change in the neurological measures (PubMed 16622140).
  • 04Durability still separates the materials: from year five onward the composite arm of that trial needed roughly 50% more additional restorative treatment (PubMed 16622140).
  • 05A meta-analysis of 8 high-quality clinical studies concluded posterior composite restorations show lower longevity and more secondary caries than amalgam, with no significant difference in fracture (PubMed 26116767).

/ Introduction

Dental health is crucial to overall well-being, and restorative procedures like fillings play a vital role in preserving oral functionality and aesthetics . Among various materials used in dental restorations, amalgam fillings have been a mainstay for over a century. In this guide, we explore the science behind amalgam fillings, their advantages and drawbacks, and how they compare to alternative materials, while answering commonly searched questions and clarifying concepts like amalgamation, amalgamated, and amalgamate .

/ What Are Amalgam Fillings?

Amalgam fillings, commonly referred to as “silver fillings,” are dental restorations used to repair cavities caused by tooth decay. Despite the name, they are not pure silver but a metallic amalgamation of various elements.

Composition of Amalgam

Amalgam is a blended alloy composed of:

  • Mercury (approx. 50%) – binds alloy particles and creates a moldable paste
  • Silver: adds strength and durability
  • Tin: enhances workability
  • Copper: increases hardness and reduces corrosion
  • Zinc (optional): prevents oxidation during amalgamation

This amalgamated blend is shaped into the cavity and hardens quickly, making it ideal for posterior restorations.

/ Advantages of Amalgam Fillings

1. Durability and Longevity

Amalgam is renowned for its strength, with a lifespan of 10–15 years or more, especially in molars that endure significant chewing pressure.

2. Cost-Effectiveness

Less expensive than composite or gold fillings, amalgam remains an accessible option for patients seeking functional solutions.

3. Resistance to Wear

Amalgam is highly wear-resistant and suited for patients with bruxism (teeth grinding) or heavy biting forces.

/ Considerations and Concerns

1. Aesthetic Limitations

The metallic appearance makes amalgam more noticeable, particularly on visible teeth. Patients often prefer tooth-colored alternatives for smile zones.

2. Mercury Content

Though concerns exist, reputable bodies like the ADA and WHO consider amalgam fillings safe for most individuals. Pregnant individuals and those with mercury allergies may require alternatives.

3. Expansion and Contraction

Amalgam can slightly expand and contract with temperature changes, potentially stressing the surrounding tooth over time. Routine dental check-ups are essential.

/ Amalgam vs. Composite Fillings

FeatureAmalgam FillingsComposite Fillings
AppearanceMetallic, visibleTooth-colored, blends naturally
Durability10–15+ years5–7 years
CostMore affordableGenerally more expensive
Application TimeFaster placementLonger due to layering technique
Best ForMolars, high-chewing-pressure zonesFront or visible teeth

/ When Should Amalgam Fillings Be Replaced?

Even the most durable materials degrade over time. You may need to replace an amalgam filling if you experience:

  • Cracks, chipping, or discoloration
  • Sensitivity to hot or cold
  • Decay under or around the filling
  • Pain or discomfort while chewing

Replacement options include composite, ceramic, or gold. If mercury sensitivity is a concern, seek a dentist who follows Safe Amalgam Removal protocols.

/ Are Amalgam Fillings Still Used in Modern Dentistry?

Yes, though their usage has declined. Amalgam is still valued for its strength, especially in developing countries or public healthcare systems. Some regions like the EU limit amalgam use in children and pregnant individuals. Many modern clinics offer both amalgam and advanced materials, empowering patients with choice.

/ Myths and Facts About Mercury in Amalgam Fillings

Myth: Amalgam is toxic.

Fact: Mercury in amalgam is chemically bound and poses minimal risk in typical use.

Myth: Amalgam causes chronic illnesses.

Fact: No scientific evidence directly links amalgam to conditions like Alzheimer’s or multiple sclerosis.

Myth: It must be removed preventively.

Fact: Removing intact amalgam can release more mercury vapor. Dentists advise removal only when medically necessary.

/ Historical Use of Amalgam in Dentistry

Amalgam’s history dates back to the 1800s. Its affordability and ease of use made it the gold standard for generations. Despite ongoing debates, its role in advancing restorative dentistry is undeniable. With the rise of aesthetic dentistry, amalgam's dominance has waned, but it remains relevant where function outweighs form.

/ Amalgam vs. Gold Fillings: Which Lasts Longer?

Gold can last 20–30 years and is extremely biocompatible and non-corrosive. However, it’s costly and aesthetically outdated. Amalgam, while less elegant, is far more affordable and still impressively long-lasting, making it ideal for those prioritizing function over form.

/ Frequently Asked Questions

What does “amalgamation” mean?

A process of combining multiple elements into a cohesive whole. In dentistry, it refers to mixing mercury with alloy powders.

What does “amalgamated” mean?

Describes something that has been unified like the combination of metals forming an amalgam filling.

Should I amalgamate my pensions?

Financial context, not dental but “amalgamate” here also means “to combine.” Seek advice from a financial advisor.

Amalgam fillings remain a practical and proven option for dental restorations, especially for back teeth that endure intense bite pressure. While less visually appealing than composites or ceramics, they continue to serve patients reliably worldwide. By understanding their composition, advantages, limitations, and historical context, patients can make informed choices in collaboration with their dental professionals.

Let’s plan the right treatment together.

Free Assessment
GeneralMosdent
// Written by
Hakan Kaval
Dentist Hakan Kaval
Implantology · Aesthetic Dentistry
Medically reviewed by: Dr Ferit Kaval, PhD

Let’s plan the right treatment together.

Your personal data is processed as described in our .

Message on WhatsApp
// Frequently Asked

Frequently asked questions

Are amalgam fillings safe?+

The direct evidence comes from a randomised clinical trial of 507 children in Lisbon aged 8 to 10, half receiving amalgam and half composite, followed annually for 7 years. Measures of memory, attention, visuomotor function and nerve conduction velocity showed no significant differences at any time point (P values 0.29 to 0.91), even though urinary mercury ran 1.0 to 1.5 micrograms per gram higher in the amalgam group (PubMed 16622140).

How long do amalgam fillings last compared with composite?+

Amalgam has the longer published track record in load-bearing back teeth. A meta-analysis of 8 high-quality clinical studies found composite restorations had lower longevity and more secondary caries than amalgam, with no significant difference in fracture rates (PubMed 26116767). The randomised Lisbon trial showed the same pattern in practice: from year five the composite arm required about 50% more additional restorative treatment (PubMed 16622140).

Should I replace my old amalgam fillings?+

Not preventively. Removing an intact restoration releases more mercury vapour than leaving it in place and sacrifices sound tooth structure. Replacement is indicated for cracks, marginal breakdown, decay under the filling, or persistent sensitivity and pain on chewing. Since the composite alternative required around 50% more further treatment from year five in randomised follow-up (PubMed 16622140), changing material is not automatically an upgrade.

Why is amalgam used less in modern dentistry?+

Three reasons stack up: appearance, environmental mercury regulation and the availability of adhesive alternatives, with several jurisdictions restricting use in children and pregnant patients. The clinical evidence has not moved in the same direction; the pooled comparison of 8 studies still credits amalgam with greater longevity and fewer secondary caries in posterior teeth (PubMed 26116767), so the shift is driven by policy and aesthetics as much as by outcomes.

Do amalgam fillings cause Alzheimer's disease or multiple sclerosis?+

No study has established such a link. The randomised trial closest to the question tracked neurological function directly in 507 children over 7 years using memory, attention, visuomotor and nerve conduction testing, and found average z scores near zero with no significant group difference at any point (PubMed 16622140). Mercury in set amalgam is chemically bound within the alloy rather than free.

It begins with a conversation

Discuss the questions with your doctor.

WhatsApp

Not sure which treatment fits? Tell us what’s wrong →